One of the most disturbing aspects of so called “ex gay reparative therapy” is the one that no one is talking about directly. Granted, every aspect stinks about “reparative therapy”. None of it is based on science, nothing about it is based on anything but the desire for one element of society to change another element of society into something they aren’t. What “reparative” “ex gay” therapy is and does, is bad. Mathew Shurka’s recent video describes it well and from the heart. We have been, and are, discussing what this practice is with California ‘s landmark new law that prevents minors from being subjected to destructive sexual orientation “reparative therapies” and the discussion has broadened to other states.
But we are not calling out and discussing who is conducting these therapies and why.
As a dad, I am in constant vigilance as to who is taking care of my kids. What are their credentials, background, references and are they SAFE? I may seem intrusive and even heartless in this pursuit for my kids’ care in health and education, but hey, these are my kids, and I am vigilant against someone doing them harm, and that is in regard to therapies that are regarded by pediatric agencies as positive.
Most who are sent to this kind of “ex gay” consultation are kids. Even if parents, ignoring pediatric experts, believed in the heinous goals of “reparative therapy”, even if they wanted the spurious results it “promises” with a parent protective mindset, they should have at least some sense of protection as to who is preying on their kids.
The subject of “recovery” is not a foreign one for me. In my twenties, I drove myself to rock bottom as a young alcoholic. I have recently celebrated over three decades of continuous sobriety. A major aspect of that sobriety is in working with others who are trying to stay sober and sharing experience, strength and hope. This is the theory by which many “ex-gay therapists” claim to operate. They present the illusion that they are “recovered” and to maintain that “abstinence”, they must work with others grappling with the same issue.
Since sexuality is not a “recovery issue”, their assertion is fallacious.
Pretending their argument has validity for a moment though, there is another huge difference between my experience and theirs that brings in even MORE concern about who they are and what they are doing. In my case, the substance of the addiction is physical. There is an actual chemical that is required in my system to get me drunk and cause a slip. That chemical has to be ingested by me to turn me back into a practicing alcoholic. That is not true in their presumptive case. Sexuality starts in the mind, and the emotions. One does not have to be performing actual sex acts to be in the depths of one’s sexuality. Seduction, fantasy, the emotion behind a touch, even the right look, all can embody the totality of heterosexual or homosexual feelings fully. I cannot embody alcoholism when I continue to be stone cold sober physically. It is why alcoholics in recovery avoid “the first drink” at all costs.
Why do these men who claim to be cured by a therapy with a dismal track record eagerly clamor to become therapists and hands-on advocates, and why are they allowed to do so? The analogy of the “ex-gay” being in recovery and working with others in need for the well being of both is a false one, even under the context they would have us believe. Their situation in analogy would be that engagement in sexual discussion and sharing about emotions is like a recovering alcoholic going on a wine tasting tour with a practicing alcoholic, swirling the wine in his mouth and spitting it out. In recovery terminology, that would not approximate sobriety, that would be a major “slip”. An “ex-gay” conducting “therapy” for someone trying to “recover” from same sex attraction is therefore not abstaining, but participating. For them, if they are truly “cured” they should be avoiding anything around homosexuality as a reformed smoker avoids a smoke filled room.
Consider this in respect to “ex gay therapists” who have been public::
Aaron Bitzer, is a plaintiff in a law suit challenging California’s new law protecting minors. He claims to have been cured of his homosexuality and rather than starting a new life avoiding homosexuality all together, he now seeks to be a therapist to discuss and listen to other men’s gay experiences.
David Pickup, a Glendale, Calif. therapist protested the new law coming into effect. He told Fox News that he’s been a member of NARTH for more than eight years after he went through his own ex-gaying treatment and now seeks out patients with whom to discuss it. Pickup stated that he’s had thousands of sexual interactions with men, but describes himself as a heterosexual man with a homosexual challenge.
Richard Cohen, author of “Coming out Straight” describes having a bisexual past in which, among same sex attraction incidents, he had a boyfriend during his first three years of marriage. His brand of “therapy” includes intimate physical cuddling as a reparative technique, claiming this intimacy to be non-sexual. (Warning to single gay men with “loves to cuddle” in your romantic wish list: Your favorite intimacy may turn your partner straight. At least, if you follow Richard Cohen’s line of thinking.)
Joe Dallas, an ex-gay leader and speaker in southern California, claims a promiscuous bisexual past. He recently shared feelings about a sole protester at a Chik-Fil-A in his blog: “I liked you immediately”. Joe apparently spent his hour-plus time in the Chick-Fil-A anti-gay gorge fest obsessing on the gay man outside with a sign rather than focusing on the family with whom he was eating protest chicken.
The list goes on.
The vulnerable participants, through external or internalized homophobia from themselves or others, seeking out this therapy, should not be subjected to individuals who are likely to be using them for some conscious, subconscious or even unconscious self gratification.
A recent article described the experience of Chaim Levin, “The turning point was in October 2008, when Levin said his “life coach” told him to slowly undress and touch himself in front of a mirror while the life coach stood several feet away. The exercise lasted about an hour, and all Levin could think about was how badly he wanted to leave the center and never go back. Afterwards, he went home and vowed never to tell anyone about it.”
Right now, nothing is really being done to stop this predatory situation under the guise of these men being “therapists”. It takes a practice that is at best wrong-minded, dangerous to self esteem and demoralizing and makes it completely traumatizing.
Please like our Facebook page here.
Graphics by Debbie Teashon
Pingback: A gay dad sounds off on the aspect of conversion therapy that no one’s talking about | A Day at a Time – and other readings
My step mother took me to a mental health clinic to “get me fixed” when I was 14, fortunately the councilling session turned into a “what makes you think he is broken?” session. Therapy is not a bad thing when the therapist doesn’t have an ego involved.
I was in reparative NARTH therapy for 7 years (as an adult) and I had sexual encounters with two of my “ex-gay” therapists/counselors…it was all smoke an mirrors. I met hundreds of guys in therapy/support groups and none of them were “cured”. We all were just in stages of denial, falling off the wagon, repentance and denial all over again….It took over 10 years for me to accept who I was, but now fast forward 10 years later of living as a content, openly gay, and happily partnered man, I never have looked back…..
The idea that someone can be cured of their sexuality is preposterous. If they want to test it, why not set up clinics to cure heterosexuality? People will discover real fast it isn’t possible. Only people who think sexuality is a choice could believe in these “cures”. Just this generation’s snake oil. I wish anyone who subjects their children to this would be brought up on child abuse charges.
Great response…as I ask my heterosexual friends: “when did you know you were straight?” At some point in the future, “coming out” will be not necessary, people will just be who they are…
I don’t believe in sex therapy but I do believe sexuality is a choice. The only way I would believe homosexuality is not a choice is if there is sex chromosome abnormalities, ambiguous genitalia, and hermaphroditism, other wise there is some level of social factor that leads to that tendency. How many of your homosexual friends were molested or sexually abused? It seems like males molested or sexualized by other males are likely to become homosexual or bisexual. Women molested by males or sexualized by males or females tend to have the same tendencies. It’s complicated, but unless there is some sort of birth abnormality, no one is born “gay”, it’s sexual preference based on human experience and I’m completely fine with that, we are all somewhat bisexual to some extent, and then we find a soul mate… man or woman, doesn’t matter, but we choose. I’m glad you found your life partner and soul mate, and that you are happy, that is all that matters.
Thanks for your comment, although you seem a bit conflicted since you state that bisexuality is both a choice…and not a choice. You certainly may believe whatever you wish, but I am thinking that I have met and known many more gay people than you have, and I can assure you that the vast majority were not sexually abused. You also should know that the therapist who originally came up with that theory did so without studying any actual patients. Sexuality is thought to be biologically based, not necessarily genetically driven. As it happens, we will be launching a guest blog on that very subject in a day or two. Stay tuned.
I am a gay guy who was never molested ever, I never had gay friends growing up, and I never knew gay people. Here I am, proudly gay. Explain to me how I could have gained this “human experience” when I stated above, “I never had gay friends growing up, and I never knew gay people, nor was I molested.”
That is the beauty of an open and free society: you are entitled to express your opinion freely. However, it does not exempt you from consequences. Your equation of homosexual orientation with sexual abuse is insulting. In one equation you minimize and marginalize not one but two groups. How every efficient. You see, it is people holding this view that when a victim comes forward who happens to be gay they say “YOU SEE! WE WERE RIGHT!”, loudly and repeatedly. This discourages people who have been through the trauma of sexual abuse from coming forward; they aren’t coming forward to be a statistic to make you feel better they are coming forward to try to make themselves whole. But your little equation makes short work of that process now doesn’t it? You can go pat yourself on the back about how right you are while another person finds the hand full of pills or the handgun or whatever else will take the pain away permanently. But, you’re OK. You are safe in your little box, your opinion has been proven correct yet again. How nice for you.
California is seeking to regulate the practice of psychotherapy as it relates to minor patience. This is a right of the state since the state grants the license to practice mental health in the state. If this bit of regulation runs the charlatans out on a rail, sounds good to me.
You said that beautifully!
Reblogged this on It Is What It Is.
Grat blog Rob. Had not thought about this part of it because I would instictively not allow my children around those people anyway. The analogy that came to my mind while reading it was : Taking your child to ex-gay reparitive therapy would be like taking your child up to the creepy guy sitting at the edge of the play ground, introducing them, and then walking them both to the panel van in the parking lot, sayin “I’ll be back in a few weeks, hope the molestation goes well”.
How many of these “therapists” have dabbled in child porn and/or abuse?
I must say that this is an exceptionally honest and insightful piece…one which I can’t imagine any straight person worried about their gay child can afford to ignore. Having tried ( and ‘failed’) at reparative therapy in my younger years, I can attest to the folly of it. But you bring the point home in a way that had never occurred to me. Nice piece of writing.
to me these actions are more destructive, predatory and dangerous, than what they claim to be curing which cant be cured …. it is not illness people, is called being human, and true to you. One should never change who they are to fit into society or a world that sees them as wrong, as that leads to far more dangerous and life threatening consequences. When will people truly learn the real art of acceptance?
A very good point, and one that hadn’t occurred to me. There really is no end to how disturbing this shit is.