Please like our Facebook page here.
Please like our Facebook page here.
A “no joke” joke!
Dedicated to my Lesbian daughter.
All Good Signs Sunday graphics are free to pass around, or post on your web site or blog.
Image by Ono Kono
At the end of 1999, the Hawaiian Supreme Court closed down hope that its state would be the first in the nation to grant gay couples the right to wed. In Vermont, the very first Civil Union law for gay couples was still a year away.
It was then, despite a country that was all but ignoring marriage equality, that a minister fresh from seminary was asked to officiate at her first gay wedding, a Holy Union ceremony.
Reverend Marian Hale felt protective of her first couple even though they had acknowledged to her that some of the people in attendance looked on the event somewhat as a joke. They however did not.
She was gratified that one of the groom’s parents had flown in specifically for the ceremony, but equally pained by the fact that the mother of the other groom, who lived across town, was specifically boycotting it. Marian fought the specter of rejection due to the absent mother, and worked to keep it from affecting the beauty of the day. Her goal was for her young couple to feel nothing but the love and adoration that was due them.
To that end, she created a ceremony by which roses, for one groom, and lilies for the other, would be combined in a crystal vase signifying their union. This blend would be done by the families and friends in attendance.
As the ceremony progressed, Marian noticed the face of the father who had flown in. She could see that he had come as a matter of duty. He sat back gingerly toying with the rose. She could feel her heart sinking as she feared more parental rejection was in the making.
Finally he stood and came to the front. As he placed the rose in the bowl, the full weight of what his son was doing hit him. He started to speak, and then weep as , for the first time, the love, respect and honor he felt for his son and his new son in law came spilling out. As the son hugged his tear stained Dad, Marian saw that the father had, in that moment, undergone the process of true acceptance.
The spirit of the congregation welled up, and with honor and dignity, the couple was declared as one. They were no longer single, but a family.
Marian stayed after for the reception. She chatted with the guests and found that for most, this was their first gay wedding as well. All were moved by its impact on them.
When it came time to say good bye, Marian saw the groom whose mother had not been in attendance. She went up to him and expressed her regret over what his mother had missed. She anticipated some hurt or anger, but only heard forgiveness in his response, “I accept that she’s doing what she feels is right for her, and only hope that one day soon she’ll be able to come visit us, spend time with us.”
That night, Marian felt a transformation of sorts happening within herself, and when she woke the next morning… in her own word…”The world had shifted. The words that came almost immediately are these:
If that had been a heterosexual wedding at that day and time, there could be all kinds of reasons, agendas if you will, for this event to be taking place. There can be a baby on the way, pressure from the family, even pressure from the church. There can be tax reasons, other financial reasons – or even a Green Card!
For this gay wedding, none of these agendas applied. It happened solely because two people wanted to stand side by side and be witnessed making a life commitment to one another, that was the only reason for it. It was, and is so clean, so pure, so simple.”
What Marian saw was what hundreds of thousands of LGBT couples know. Our marriages ARE… not WILL BE. We fight for marriage equality because our families require the protections, and the abilities to cope with life events. Our children deserve this and our spouses deserve this.
In the end, however, we have something that no political party, no federal Constitutional amendment, no family rejection and no public mocking can take from us– our deep ability to adore our soul partners and to commit.
They can mess with our legal recognition. But they can never make our love illegal.
Please like our Facebook page here.
Contact Reverend Marian Hale
See Reverend Marian Hale here.
Image by Ono Kono
Despite societal discrimination and religious persecution, homosexuality and bi-sexuality, like heterosexuality, are inborn traits that cannot be changed and are not a choice. Attempted suppression does not work. It always pushes through. Human sexuality is very complex. It is not simply one moment or one single dividing cell, that affects one’s sexuality but a series of changes and combinations of androgens released prenatally at specific times (or not) which establish a person’s sexual orientation.
Many years ago it was believed by some that sexual orientation could be changed or molded based on training and conditioning a child to identify as a male or female, and that they would then be attracted to the opposite gender. However, this has been proven to be false.
Brian S. Mustanski, reports on a case study in, A Critical Review Of Recent Biological Research On Human Sexual Orientation. In 36 boys surgically made into girls due to injury or malformed penis, only one patient maintained a female identity and reported sexual attraction toward males. Although these patients had sex reassignment surgery at birth, [including female hormone treatment throughout their lives, being influenced as girls and raised as girls], the sexual attraction toward females seems to have been determined from male typical hormone levels en utero. Prenatal androgen activity, or absence of the activity, is extremely indicative that sexual orientation comes from prenatal neurohormonal effects (Mustanksi).
Confirmed by Mustanski, as well as Emmanuelle Jannini…, et al, in Male Homosexuality: Nature or Culture, is a certain study, which has been replicated many times, and the findings reproduced by several groups of scientists and doctors in different countries around the world, is called the fraternal birth order study. This study has conclusively established that homosexual men are more likely to have one or more older brothers. The finding has proven to be true, even when the biological brothers were not raised in the same household or did not know one another. The prevalence is not affected if they have older sisters–only older brothers. The rate of homosexuality among brothers is 9% higher than in random population samples. These findings discredit homosexuality as a choice and make evident its biological nature (Mustanksi; Jannini…,et al). In a research paper by Marc S. Breedlove called, Homosexuality and Finger Length, Dr. Ray Blanchard comments, approximately 15% of homosexual men are gay because they have older brothers. He concludes it is absurd that a person should be unable to marry the person they love just because their Mom had sons before them (Breedlove…,et al). There are theories being researched as to why and how this occurs, one is called the maternal immune hypothesis.
In the maternal immune hypothesis, scientists believe that fetal cells or cell fragments from the male babies entering maternal circulation, common during childbirth, triggers the mother’s immune system to produce antibodies against these male specific molecules. The strength of the maternal immunization increases with each male fetus and so increases the probability of homosexuality with each younger brother. Similarly to the way it remembers Rh factors, the mother’s body remembers each male fetus. The maternal immune hypothesis does not explain the orientation of all homosexual men. “There are other aetiological factors, which probably include polymorphic genes and possibly include atypical hormone levels at critical stages of fetal development” (Blanchard; Bogaert).
In studies by Franz J. Kallmann, with identical and fraternal gay twins verses non-related adopted brothers found that when one identical twin [of twins raised separately] self identified as homosexual 52% of them both self-identified as homosexuals, 22% of fraternal both self-identified as homosexual verses only 5% of the non-related adopted brothers were so. This data is conclusive evidence that the more genetically linked the pair is the more likely they will both be gay or straight. Later experiments for females found evidence with similar results (Kallmann).
Bruce King reports in Human Sexuality Today, there are numerous individuals born with ambiguous genitalia, and approximately 1 in 426 babies are born with unusual sex chromosome combinations. XX is associated with females and XY is associated with males. However, about 1 in 500 male babies have one or more extra X chromosome. These people can be XXY or XXXY. This unusual chromosome combination is known as Klinefelter’s syndrome. Approximately 1 in 65,000 babies is born as a hermaphrodite, having some or all of both sex organs. Even a child with a normally male associated XY chromosome combination may not have male genitalia at birth.
Here is a real scenario: A person who does not start menstruating as expected during adolescence goes to a physician to find out why. The physician discovers that this person—whose outward appearance [including no penis] and [belief] of self are both female—has no uterus or ovaries, but instead has male XY chromosomes and internal male genitalia. Is this person female or male? This information indicates there is not necessarily a direct relationship between sex, orientation and gender. No matter how an individual’s genitals appear or what their chromosomes are, their sexual identity is a function of the genetic-endocrine forces and is prenatally determined.
To those who use the Bible as the answer to the question of whether homosexuality is right or wrong, I ask this: What answers does the Bible have on the issues of sex chromosome abnormalities, ambiguous genitalia, and hermaphroditism? In your eyes, God’s eyes, the eyes of the church, who are these people allowed to love, marry and have a family with? What if the doctor and the parents decide to do surgery on the hermaphrodite baby to make it more clearly one gender or another, but that child grows up to love someone of the same gender they were surgically made into? From the standpoint of the church, are they going to hell for sinning? This is not a tiny amount of people we’re talking about here. With over seven billion people on this planet, that means almost 108,000 people right now on earth were babies born as hermaphrodites. What if no surgery is done on the baby? Then in that case, with both gender characteristics in one person, do they get a free pass as far as the church is concerned? Whatever sexual orientation they have is ok?
The point being made is that there are numerous issues related to sexuality that were completely unknown thousands of years ago when the Bible was being written, and therefore not addressed. Modern medical science is an amazing thing. Modern Psychological science is an amazing thing. It is time to trust science, while following the MESSAGE of the Bible. Love thy neighbor as thyself. Homosexuality as we know it today is about two consenting adults loving one another. The Bible verses used to condemn homosexuality are either from Leviticus, which is no longer followed in modern Christianity, or they are in reference to combinations of violence, rape, and prostitution, not loving committed relationships. Homosexuality in modern times is equivalent to heterosexuality. People meet, they go on a few dates, they perhaps fall in love and decide they want to spend their lives together and wish to marry.
In a New York Times article by Frank Bruni, referencing the rights we have [in America] including the right to bear arms, he said, “Among adults, the right to love whom you’re moved to love—and to express it through… marriage, is surely as vital to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness as a Glock. And it is much less likely to cause injury.”
Let all people pursue their own love and happiness.
Please “like” our Facebook page here.
Works Cited
Blanchard, Ray. “Review and Theory of Handedness, Birth Order, and Homosexuality in Men.” Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis Group. http://www.psypress.com/laterality, 29 Nov. 2007. Web. 2 Apr. 2012.
Breedlove, S. Marc, Cynthia L. Jordon, Tessa J. Breedlove, Nicholas J. Breedlove, Andrew D. Huberman, Bradley M. Cooke, Scott E. Christensen, Michelle E. Pepitone, and Terrance J. Williams. “Homosexuality and Finger Length.” University of Nebraska–Lincoln. Department of Psychology and Graduate Groups Neuroscience, Endocrinology, 30 Mar. 2000. Web. 28 Mar.2012. <http://www.unl.edu/rhames/courses/readings/homofinger/homo_finger.html>.
Bruni, Frank. “Genetic or Not, Gay Won’t Go Away.” New York Times Sunday Review, 28 Jan. 2012. Web. 12 Apr. 2012. <http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/29/opinion/sunday/bruni-gay-wont-go-away-genetic-or-not.html>.
Jannini, Emmanuele A., Ray Blanchard, Andrea Camperio-Ciani, and John Bancroft,”Male Homosexuality: Nature or Culture?” National Center for Biotechnology Information. U.S. National Library of Medicine, Oct. 2011. Web. 31 Mar. 2012. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21053405>.
Kallmann, Franz J. “Twin and Sibship Study of Overt Male Homosexuality.” Nih.gov. Columbia University, New York. Web. Apr. 2012. <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1716443/pdf/ajhg00421- 0084.pdf>.
King, Bruce M. “Chapter 8 Becoming a Woman/Becoming a Man: Gender Identity and Gender Roles.” Human Sexuality Today. Seventh ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, 2012. 199-204. Print.
Mustanski, Brian S. “A Critical Review Of Recent Biological Research On Human Sexual Orientation.” Annual Review Of Sex Research 13.(2002): 89. Academic Search Complete. Web. 31 Mar. 2012
Image by Ono Kono
My younger brother is gay. Gay as laughter. Gay as the day is long. One of the finest moments in my life, and one of the greatest compliments anyone has ever paid me, was the day he felt safe to come out to me. He’s in his mid-30s now, but he’ll always be my little brother. And man, I love that kid. He’s brilliant, he’s funny, and he’s kind. And he just married a phenomenal man.
I was always predisposed to like his husband because, y’know, he’s my brother’s partner and therefore has automatic status in my heart. The wonderful bonus is that I really like him. He’s brilliant, he’s funny, and he’s kind. He’s a cool dude to hang out with. He also stood by my brother like a rock when my brother had a life-threatening cancer that cost him his left eye.
They married in May. It was a wonderful ceremony in which I was honored to stand by my brother, supporting him in his vows. My eyes teared up like they always do at weddings. I had the joy of watching two people commit to a lifetime together. It filled my heart.
Folks started posting photos from the wedding on Facebook, and I proudly reposted photos of the ceremony (with me looking awesome in my new suit, of course). Shortly after that, I received this message from a FB friend:
“Hey David, I am removing you from my friends list…sorry man, that latest post is way over the top! Homosexuals joining in “Holy” matrimony…I don’t think so??? The Holy Bible speaks out against homosexuality and speaks highly of Holy matrimony between a man and a woman. It’s nothing more than a slap in the face to those who choose God’s Word, for homosexuals to join in a Holy marriage. I’m only defriending you so I don’t have to look at your anti-God stuff anymore…nothing personal!”
Wow.
This came from a man I used to work with. A man I respect in his dedication to his family, and in his desire to live a moral and ethical life. A man with whom I have had some very interesting religious debates. He has become a Baptist preacher since we last spoke in person, and I suppose that makes this message unsurprising.
But, I was still surprised. I was taken aback. I needed a moment. I was hurt.
I was inclined to hurl some expletives in his direction.
But, only for a moment. He’s not really that important of a person in my life. I had actually at times grown rather tired of his Facebook postings…I don’t have a great need for fundamentalist dogma in my day. So, on some level, good riddance.
I sent him a letter at his church, expressing my disappointment in his withdrawal. I had a few friends read the letter before I sent it, to make sure that it didn’t contain too much bile. I’m not surprised that I haven’t heard back from him.
The situation got me thinking: What if this hadn’t been about my brother’s wedding, but about MY wedding? What if it hadn’t been from a distant friend, but from a beloved family member?
Ouch.
How many millions of gay kids (and adults) have had that exact thing happen to them? How many millions more will in the future?
I’m sorry.
I’m sorry for that pain. I’m sorry for that rejection. I’m sorry for that isolation.
I’m straight. Straight as a yardstick. Straight as an arrow. I am in your corner. If I could take on that pain for you, I would.
I love you.
If you’re gay, I think that’s wonderful, and I’m truly happy for you. I wish you all the love and joy in the world.
If you’re straight, I think that’s wonderful, and I’m truly happy for you. I wish you all the love and joy in the world. And I charge you, I charge you to imagine the above scenario played out with YOU as the target of rejection. Imagine the people closest to you telling you, essentially, “You are fundamentally flawed and I want nothing to do with you.” Our LGBTQ brothers and sisters face this everyday. Please don’t forget that.
The poor, misguided soul is no longer in my life. That’s okay. My brother and his husband still are. I just hung out with my brother a few weeks ago, and it was a blast. He’s brilliant, he’s funny, and he’s kind. I couldn’t be prouder to call him my brother. I love him, and love wins, period.
Don’t forget to “Like” us on Facebook here.
Image by Ono Kono.